Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions
Welcome to The SCOTUS Focus, an independent entity covering the Supreme Court from an independent perspective.
- 24 часа
- −3
- 7 дней
- –
- 30 дней
- −34
- Реакции
- 53
- Репосты
- –
- Комментарии
- –
Динамика подписчиков
Подписчиков у канала «Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions»: 5 839. Отток за последние 30 дней: 34 (-0,6 %).
По дням, последние 30 дней
| Дата | Подписчики | Изменение | Посты | Ср. просмотры поста |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 ноя | 5 839 | −3 | 0 | – |
| 10 ноя | 5 842 | −3 | 0 | – |
| 9 ноя | 5 845 | −1 | 2 | 6 675 |
| 8 ноя | 5 846 | −27 | 0 | – |
| 8 окт | 5 873 | – | 0 | – |
Просмотры по возрасту поста
Средние просмотры в каждом возрасте, посты за последние 30 дней.
- 7 дней
- 5 780
Когда публикует
Время по UTC. 22 поста за 90 дней.
Последние посты
-
JUST IN - Supreme Court rules 8-1 to allow the Trump administration to construct a border barrier in Texas’s Big Bend National Park region. Justice Jackson would deny the application. Link - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/26pdf/26a560_onkq.pdf
8 190 просмотров 113 Реакции -
Happy Monday Everyone! The justices will convene this morning to hear two cases for oral argument, and the Court will release its order list from last Friday’s conference at 9:30 AM ET. 1). Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. 25-159 - The dispute involves landowners whose property was taken for a natural gas pipeline under the federal Natural Gas Act. The company exercised eminent-domain authority to obtain the necessary property. The disagreement concerns how the landowners should be compensated for that taking. The central issue is whether courts should use state-law rules when calculating just compensation, or whether a uniform federal standard should apply. 2). Nielsen v. Wa...
5 160 просмотров 24 Реакции -
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone! Today the justices will convene for one oral argument this morning in a case about federal habeas corpus. 1). Guerrero v. Johnson 25-1003 - Dexter Johnson is challenging restrictions on successive federal habeas corpus petitions. Federal law generally limits prisoners’ ability to file repeated petitions challenging their convictions or sentences. One exception permits a successive petition based on a new rule of constitutional law that the Supreme Court has made retroactive to cases on collateral review. The Court must determine whether that exception applies when a prisoner could have raised a claim based on the rule in an earlier habeas petition. Arg...
4 490 просмотров 11 Реакции -
Happy Election Day Everyone! Today, millions of Americans across the nation will be heading to the polls to cast their ballots for the midterm elections. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court will sit for oral argument in a case that could affect Employment Division v. Smith. 1). St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy 25-581 - St. Mary Catholic Parish operates a Catholic preschool in Colorado. The state offers funding to eligible preschools through its universal preschool program, but the dispute concerns requirements that providers follow the state’s nondiscrimination rules. The parish argues that these requirements interfere with its religious freedom by preventing it from hiring staff who share it...
4 360 просмотров 32 Реакции -
BREAKING - Supreme Court rejects bid from Trump administration to allow 20,000+ ballots in California to be set aside, citing suspected irregularities and non citizens voting. There are no noted dissents.
-
JUST IN - Supreme Court releases its January sitting schedule. Click the link below to find out which cases are being argued during that month. Link - https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalJanuary2027.pdf
5 240 просмотров 14 Реакции -
Happy November Everyone! Justices will convene this morning for their November sitting with two cases for oral arguments. 1). Maxwell v. Dinis 25-5930 - William Maxwell disputes how his earned time credits under the First Step Act were handled. Those credits can help eligible federal prisoners move sooner to halfway houses or home confinement. The case also raises questions about what happens when prison officials obstruct the administrative process prisoners must ordinarily complete before filing suit. 2). Younge v. Fulton County Judicial Circuit District Attorneys Office 25-352 - The dispute concerns the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and whether a party can rely on an affirmativ...
4 350 просмотров 28 Реакции -
JUST IN - Supreme Court rules 8-1 to allow New Hampshire’s voter ID guidance to continue for the midterm elections, citing Purcell. Justice Jackson dissented. Link - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/26pdf/26a512_6j37.pdf
5 000 просмотров 70 Реакции -
BREAKING - Supreme Court rules 7-2 in favor of the Trump administration over a dispute regarding FCC Political Ads low cost rates. Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson noted their dissent. Link - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/26pdf/26a476_k537.pdf
8 990 просмотров 100 Реакции -
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone! Today is the justice as we sit for one oral argument this morning. 1). Salazar v. Paramount Global — No. 25-459 - This case concerns the meaning of the VPPA statute's definition of a “consumer,” specifically whether it covers people who receive any goods or services from a video provider or only those who receive its audiovisual offerings. Arguments for this case begin at 10 a.m. ET. Here is a link to listen live - https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
5 890 просмотров 30 Реакции
-
BREAKING - Supreme Court rules 7-2 in favor of the Trump administration over a dispute regarding FCC Political Ads low cost rates. Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson noted their dissent. Link - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/26pdf/26a476_k537.pdf
8 990 просмотров 100 Реакции -
BREAKING - Supreme Court rejects bid from Trump administration to allow 20,000+ ballots in California to be set aside, citing suspected irregularities and non citizens voting. There are no noted dissents.
-
JUST IN - Supreme Court rules 8-1 to allow the Trump administration to construct a border barrier in Texas’s Big Bend National Park region. Justice Jackson would deny the application. Link - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/26pdf/26a560_onkq.pdf
8 190 просмотров 113 Реакции -
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone! Today is the justice as we sit for one oral argument this morning. 1). Salazar v. Paramount Global — No. 25-459 - This case concerns the meaning of the VPPA statute's definition of a “consumer,” specifically whether it covers people who receive any goods or services from a video provider or only those who receive its audiovisual offerings. Arguments for this case begin at 10 a.m. ET. Here is a link to listen live - https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/live.aspx
5 890 просмотров 30 Реакции -
JUST IN - Supreme Court releases its January sitting schedule. Click the link below to find out which cases are being argued during that month. Link - https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/MonthlyArgumentCalJanuary2027.pdf
5 240 просмотров 14 Реакции -
Happy Monday Everyone! The justices will convene this morning to hear two cases for oral argument, and the Court will release its order list from last Friday’s conference at 9:30 AM ET. 1). Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. 25-159 - The dispute involves landowners whose property was taken for a natural gas pipeline under the federal Natural Gas Act. The company exercised eminent-domain authority to obtain the necessary property. The disagreement concerns how the landowners should be compensated for that taking. The central issue is whether courts should use state-law rules when calculating just compensation, or whether a uniform federal standard should apply. 2). Nielsen v. Wa...
5 160 просмотров 24 Реакции -
JUST IN - Supreme Court rules 8-1 to allow New Hampshire’s voter ID guidance to continue for the midterm elections, citing Purcell. Justice Jackson dissented. Link - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/26pdf/26a512_6j37.pdf
5 000 просмотров 70 Реакции -
Good Wednesday Morning Everyone! Today the justices will convene for one oral argument this morning in a case about federal habeas corpus. 1). Guerrero v. Johnson 25-1003 - Dexter Johnson is challenging restrictions on successive federal habeas corpus petitions. Federal law generally limits prisoners’ ability to file repeated petitions challenging their convictions or sentences. One exception permits a successive petition based on a new rule of constitutional law that the Supreme Court has made retroactive to cases on collateral review. The Court must determine whether that exception applies when a prisoner could have raised a claim based on the rule in an earlier habeas petition. Arg...
4 490 просмотров 11 Реакции -
Happy Election Day Everyone! Today, millions of Americans across the nation will be heading to the polls to cast their ballots for the midterm elections. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court will sit for oral argument in a case that could affect Employment Division v. Smith. 1). St. Mary Catholic Parish v. Roy 25-581 - St. Mary Catholic Parish operates a Catholic preschool in Colorado. The state offers funding to eligible preschools through its universal preschool program, but the dispute concerns requirements that providers follow the state’s nondiscrimination rules. The parish argues that these requirements interfere with its religious freedom by preventing it from hiring staff who share it...
4 360 просмотров 32 Реакции -
Happy November Everyone! Justices will convene this morning for their November sitting with two cases for oral arguments. 1). Maxwell v. Dinis 25-5930 - William Maxwell disputes how his earned time credits under the First Step Act were handled. Those credits can help eligible federal prisoners move sooner to halfway houses or home confinement. The case also raises questions about what happens when prison officials obstruct the administrative process prisoners must ordinarily complete before filing suit. 2). Younge v. Fulton County Judicial Circuit District Attorneys Office 25-352 - The dispute concerns the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and whether a party can rely on an affirmativ...
4 350 просмотров 28 Реакции
Вопросы о канале «Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions»
Сколько подписчиков у канала «Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions»?
У канала «Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions» (@thescotusfocus) 5 839 подписчиков на 12 ноября 2026 г.
Растёт ли канал «Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions»?
Сейчас нет. Отток за последние 30 дней: 34 (-0,6 %).
О чём канал «Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions»?
Канал в категории «Право и юриспруденция», язык постов: английский. Описание канала: «Welcome to The SCOTUS Focus, an independent entity covering the Supreme Court from an independent perspective.»
Какое место занимает канал «Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions»?
По числу подписчиков: №22 в категории «Право и юриспруденция», №2 968 среди каналов на языке «английский», №3 459 в мире.
Публикует ли канал «Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions» рекламу?
За последние 30 дней ни один из 10 постов не помечен как реклама (#ad, Sponsored, «Реклама»). Рекламу без пометки определить нельзя.
Когда публикует канал «Supreme Court Announcements/Decisions»?
Пик публикаций: понедельник, около 10:00 по UTC. Выходит около 2 постов в неделю.
Статистика обновлена 36 минут назад.